In general I think it's a lot better, a few of the shots that never worked for me before, that you have kept, work better here.
The music works for me as it's a good balance that shouldn't offend anyones ears regardless of their music tastes. I seen Andy mentioned smart sound, but I'm not sure if you used something of your own. If it is a (multi-track) quick track there's a little change I'd make.
At 1:12 there's a prominent instrument/happening (I'm not great with whats going on with music terms) that fades away, comes back for a short time, fades away again at around 1:27 then back at 1:29. I'd keep it totally away between 1:12 and 1:29. If this is possible I think it could work well.
Introducing more shots before the introduction of people works better.
I'm still not a fan of the bird feeder shot, but now it doesn't change the pace of the edit, so it works better.
I think the splash after the icicle works better in this edit. I'd put it down to the movement in the title acting as a transitioning action between the shots.
And the shot between the ECU (eyes) and the church group works better now. I had a problem with this before as I felt it never worked, but knew it should be there.
The movement in your titles make a big difference, it's up to you of course, but I'd see how they look coming on screen bottom left, or right, rather than dead centre.
David.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote





Bookmarks