It so nearly worked for me.
You're right to point out the spelling mistake well, typo really. No spelling mistakes are excusable in filmmaking - given you spend hours on each minute of end product a spelling mistake looks very sloppy and insults the audience.
These sort of shots, where you're deliberately only hinting at what's being shown are very difficult to do because you, as editor, being aware of what's in the shot, "see" much more of it than the first time viewer. As a first timer, I had no preconceptions and found it all too vague/unclear - frustratingly so. It was lit interestingly but I would have liked just a touch more light on the subject making it a touch more recognisable so it became intriguing rather than frustrating. Shots towards the end were better.
The empty sofa at the end was out of focus (particularly noticable after the preceeding shots were beautifully focussed despite the lack of light). This spoilt the film for me and seemed in amateur contrast with the professional look of the rest of the film.
Great effort, none the less.
__________________
Tim
|