This is a question for devoutly religous right wingers who sleep with a Bible under their pillow, Internet video fans who lust after adult entertainment videos, and those who know their way around a video camera:
I'm not a videoographer, but I hope to take it up as soon as I get some monkeys off my back. I notice that some videos on the Internet that were made by amateur videographers have great clarity, a diamond-like quality to them, or even when not in high definition you wouldn't know it because they're crystal clear. Others are bad videos, and look like they were shot with a dirty lens.
Lets say we have two totally different videos that are hosted on the same exact web site. One is crystal clear like mountain air and the other other is so bad a quality you run to hit the back button on your web browser so you can move on to the next video. In the scenario I just gave, why is one video an eye-pleasing, user-friendly, picture-friendly winner and the other a loser?
Why did the bad video turn out bad?
Remember this question pertains to videographers who are amateurs (regular people like you and me) using the latest video camera out on the market as opposed to pros who work for movie studios. The first two amateur vids below represent good quality while the third and fourth ones represent bad quality.
EXAMPLE OF GOOD CLARITY:
YouTube - AcuteAnalogy's Channel
EXAMPLE OF BAD CLARITY: