Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Slum dog colonialism.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bristol uk
    Posts
    8,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Slum dog colonialism.

    BBC NEWS | World | South Asia | Slumdog star's home is demolished

    Thge financiers make thier dollar - 140m in box office takings and the child star of the film still lives in a tent and is at the mercy of evictions from his home - such as it is.

    I am glad I pirated it now - although watching it was a very dull waste of 2 hours.

    I found the back story to that terrible Borat film equally depressing.

    Why are film makers such Bastards ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    11,526
    Blog Entries
    24

    Default

    It makes a good headline, doesn't it?. But it's no different to any other industry; 'labour' is sourced at the lowest price to maximise profit. It's somewhat unusual within the percieved glamorous film industry to see a star paid so little. But I've no doubt that other areas of the industry are outsourced to gain from cheap labour. For example DVDs are, I'm sure, made in far away prices.

    And it's something you can't escape. Any product or service you buy will be, in part, financed by what most would consider as exploitation. The demands of the consumer and the power of market ecomomics means that costs are minimised. You don't always see this, so when the star of a blockbuster film is paid pennies, you sit up and take note. In this particular case, it's a shocking tale from both sides. On the one side the star is clearly worth more, on the other the sums paid to actors is, well, extravagent.

    People should always be paid what they are worth. What value they add. Our current gloabal economic model means that people always profits at the expense of others. People are privalidged to be born in a certain country, or area of a country. Is it the only model? No. But then throughout any system through the ages, it's always a group of people that profit over others. I wish it were not true, but it's the way of the world.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bristol uk
    Posts
    8,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It isnt my way, or the way of my friends, or your way - so I dont think it is inevitalbe and it most certainly hanst always been this way.

    It is getting worse... globalisation.

    The film industry appears to be as bad as the oil indutry for lies and exploitation.

    People are by default kind and sensitive to others, CEOs and bankers are not.

    We need a global minimum wage perhaps to stop so called free market exploitation. Not that that would have helped our hapless ex slum dogger that much.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bristol uk
    Posts
    8,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I find slum dog especially galling as the film worships riches and celebrates lottery gredd only to screw the main character in real life - amusing.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Warsop, Nottinghamshire.
    Posts
    4,465
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    On the flip side - I read recently that Titanic stars Winseltt and DiFacto helped with the fund for one of the original survivors with staying in her nursing home. She was six weeks old when it went down. So said Sky news.

    So the world in't all bad.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bristol uk
    Posts
    8,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It is - I suspect thay then got thier publicists to go on and on about - or maybe one of thier PR people said it was a savvy move.

    Being super rich and kind is contradictory. If you really were a nice person you wouldnt need millions a year to keep you in frocks and planes. Lols.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bristol uk
    Posts
    8,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    ' BING '

    We have lots of organisations that aim to foster responsible less exlpoitative modes of consumption and production - like meat that was treated better when it was alive, animal testing stuff - lots more.

    I think we need a group that aims to foster ethical film making - anyone heard of that??? ( goes to google)

    They are keen to go on about no animals getting hurt in whatever, what about the people ?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    11,526
    Blog Entries
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark W View Post
    It is getting worse... globalisation.
    Globalisation isn't new. You could argue that the world was more global at the turn of the previous century. And with that particular brand of globalisation came imperialism. That certainly wasn't an egalitarian society. Indeed, Victoirian Britain was an extremely divisive era.

    I would stand by my assertation that the world has always been unequal. People have only profited at the expense of others in order to become rich. Altruism is the reserve of the few. And true altruism rarely exists. It's the way of the world. Is it right? No. But it's what's always happened. People are rich because other people are poor. Obviously that's a truism (people can only be 'relatively' rich), but people profit at the expense of others.

    Take a look at the label on the clothes you're wearing. I'm betting they were made in a country where the wage is lower than our minimum? I'm betting the chap that made your t-shirt doesn't have the so called luxuries we take for granted. Are we making a conscious decision to keep him poor? No really, but that's why 'we' are rich. And to him, we're wealthy.

    So in my mind, yes, it has always happened and will contine to happen. Like it or not, as a part of a western country you are profiting at the expense of others. We may argue otherwise, but that's the simple truth.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bristol uk
    Posts
    8,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Spoken like a true banker - lols.

    Diecrimination and crass inequality should never be exsued as merely inevitable- thats rather depressing.

    As for my clothes - I go to some lengths to avoid the more flagrent abusers, but it's a good point and precisely why there are legions of organisations - and un resoloutions - to attenpt ot resolve these problems.

    Most of my clothes purchases are from charity shops - a deliberate eschewing of the vulgarity of the fashion industry and it mens i can spend more on cameras... lols.


    So ethical film making anyone ? Do any groups aim to foster it ?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bristol uk
    Posts
    8,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I am going to start by buying more w allen films...

    " Q: Is it an honor that some of the best actors out there still want to work with you?

    WOODY: I'm not surprised because they only work with me if they're between desirable jobs. If I call and actor or an actress and someone else like a Steven Spieberg or Martin Scorsese is calling them; they're fine directors and are offering them substantial money, they have no interest in me at all, but if they just finished a picture and they've earned their 10 million dollar salary and they have nothing to do till August and I call them in June and they like the part, you know, they say why not? "

    ref - Cinema Confidential News: 03/17/05 - INTERVIEW: Woody Allen on "Melinda and Melinda"

    He appears to be saying he wont pay daft amounts to actors - I am sure he could if he wanted to.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •