Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: RAID or separate drives?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Worcestershire, UK
    Posts
    9

    Default RAID or separate drives?

    Hi All,

    Here's my first post - please be gentle!

    I'm moving away from my old AMD setup to a new P4 based box and upgrading my disks, too. The new MoBo has SATA RAID, but I've been pretty unimpressed with my curent ATA100 RAID 1 with the XP 2100 chip and the performance using Pinnacle Studio 8.

    I realise the P4 will be better anyway - I didn't have editing in mind when I chose the AMD...

    So the question is:
    Am I better off setting up my two new SATA disks in a RAID 1 config or keeping them separate? I was thinking source video on one disk; output on the other)?

    All views/experience welcome!

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    11,513
    Blog Entries
    24

    Default

    Argh!!!! Just typed up a long response and IE crashed!!!!

    Anyway, crux of it: RAID1 is for risk averse by mirroring drives (u'll always have a working copy). RAID0 said to improve performance (read and write times). It does in benchmarks, but you you need to combine this with regular defrags etc to get the best out of your disks. One for those that want the VERY best performance (i.e every bit counts). Also lengthens boot times by checking the array.

    Two seperate drives is good from a housekeeping point of view. Me? I have both! 2x 10,000RPM discs in RAID0 for the boot drive and 2 x 160GB drives for storage.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Worcestershire, UK
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Doh! I meant RAID 0 and typed 1.

    I actually work in the storage business and I'm Storage Area Network qualified...


    My only defence is that I've been off work for a fortnight. I won't tell anyone if you don't....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    11,513
    Blog Entries
    24

    Default

    Oh dear. You'd fit it in with the IT guys at my job - someone managed to delete the procedures manual from the system. Guess they hadn't read the procedures manual....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    142

    Default

    RAID 0 kicks ass
    Pentium 4 2.4C
    1GB Kingston HyperX PC4000 Dual-Channel
    Abit IS7-G
    2x80GB Western Digital 7200RPM 8MB Cache RAID 0
    ATI All-In-Wonder 9600 Pro
    Sony DVD-ROM
    NEC CD-RW
    NEC 19\" CRT

  6. #6

    Default

    Saying it kicks ass is a very wild, generalisation. In some applications RAID 0 slows your PC down. In most applications in makes not the blindest bit of difference to speed. In some benchmarks it shows marginally increased throughput from the hard disk. But, irrespective of the speed issues there are several other risks with RAID that bear checking out.

Similar Threads

  1. To RAID or not RAID
    By Ernie in forum The Perfect Video Editing PC
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-04-2006, 06:11 PM
  2. Separate Sound Files?
    By jjm in forum Sound Recording and Audio Editing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-09-2005, 07:43 PM
  3. Would like to set up a RAID ARRAY
    By Tonupboy in forum The Perfect Video Editing PC
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-06-2004, 04:16 PM
  4. Separate editing of video audio
    By four_bes in forum General video editing software help and advice
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-11-2004, 05:28 PM
  5. RAID 0 and other things
    By atoyot in forum Hardware Problems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-11-2004, 10:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •