| | | | | Sound Recording and Audio Editing Sounds recording, mixing and editing. Get the perfect audio with your picture perfect video! | 
09-01-2006, 10:55 PM
|  | Opinionated Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,117
| | Rode mic - user opinion.
People often buy this mic as a good value directional mic. I purchased one a few months back so I can get decent sound off my tiny cam and thought I would venture an opinion.
Sound quality - good, suprisingly good. Dont get me wrong, not spine chillingly good like my 800 quid when new sony (200 to me on e bay) but impressive at the price.
Directionality - very good, as good as my longer sony, well seems that way in use.
Thats the best bits over,
Build quality - acceptable to poor. The bits that havent broken are hard plastic, but the shoe broke off after a few weeks (easily glued) and the rubber bands are all perishing fast.
Ahh, the rubber bands, well you see it come equipped with a toy version of the isolation system used on proper isoltion mounts. Looks pants, does absoloutely nothing except mean that the mic wobbles about is a daft way. Soon to be removed.
Microphonic - very, but hey it's cheap so that is okay and you dont really touch a mic like this during use.
I strongly reccomend all mic purchasers in this market to save up a few more quid and get the sen 300, and they didnt pay me to say that.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions. www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
| 
09-02-2006, 08:31 AM
| | Senior Member R=E([K/N]A)+W | | Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,592
| |
Well, I'm surprised (and perversely glad) to hear that review. I'd be well miffed to find out I'd spent a sack-full of dosh on a Sennheiser, only to find that the Aussies did the same thing for half the price.
| 
09-02-2006, 10:40 AM
|  | Senior Member Mr Crane Man | | Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire.
Posts: 2,729
| |
I've been reasonably impressed with mine - with the rider that it's about price. I haven't managed to break the shoe, but I think you're quite correct to advise saving a bit harder to buy better. Having said all that, if you're skint (like me) and are used to compromise, it'll do nicely. The sound, after all is not bad at all, and that's what a mic is all about.
| 
09-02-2006, 10:50 AM
|  | Opinionated Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,117
| |
Yes, I got it on a skint month and it works fine for me. I will be happier with it when I get the glue gun out and remove the silly suspension arrangement.
As you say, for the money it is excellent and poops on any built in cam mic, just annoys me that it appears that the marketing men had too much input in the design... 'oooo I know lets put on a wobbly isolation rubber bandy thingy'.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions. www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
| | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |  All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28 PM. | | | | |