Go Back   Video Editing Forums: Digital Director > Video Editing: Software Problems and buying advice > Sony Vegas and Media Studio

Sony Vegas and Media Studio Yep, I know they're not related, but they both fall in the Premiere Alternative bracket in my humble opinion! Post here for Ulead Media Studio or Vegas video problems or pointers...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2006, 10:34 AM
Geekman's Avatar
Junior Member
Standard Definition
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13
Geekman is on a distinguished road
Default Best Quality Render

Hello All

I have just got to the end of editing a film and I am almost ready to render. However looking at the list of so many different format options I almost had a heart attack trying to decide what to use! I did a small test render in one of the mpg formats and was quite impressed with time took it to render and its quality - except for the existence of 'interlacing lines,' you know the funny little zig zag lines around the blured areas.

So what is the best format to render to? JSYK, my film is only 13 minutes long and I do use Vegas 6. I am sorry if this question has already been asked before, I did hunt around a bit before posting but I probably missed something.

Thanks


Geekman
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2006, 11:05 AM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 4,730
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I am no expert on rendering to mpeg for DVDs but setting the project settings to 'progressive' and rendering as 'progressive' should stop the problem.

For a best quality version for my personal archive I render a DV .avi copy. That will look best.
__________________
I have one prejudice - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2006, 11:35 AM
Geekman's Avatar
Junior Member
Standard Definition
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13
Geekman is on a distinguished road
Default

Ah ok thanks. BTW where is the progressive setting? I can't see any button with that.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2006, 11:43 AM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 4,730
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

File - properties - video tab - field order - none. Then set deinterlace method to interpolate or blend. Depnds on personal choice and type of material as to what works best.
__________________
I have one prejudice - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2006, 02:24 PM
vegasarian's Avatar
Senior Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Esher, Surrey.
Posts: 322
vegasarian is on a distinguished road
Default Progressive

As Mark suggested I would always render in progressive for DVD especially if you're taking snapshots from the video (with bliurred action). If you render these with lower or upper field first you will get horrendous jitter on the DVD. You wont notice this on your comp but you certainly will on a TV.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2006, 07:48 AM
Geekman's Avatar
Junior Member
Standard Definition
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13
Geekman is on a distinguished road
Default

Hey thanks everyone! It ended up pretty good in the end so thanks a lot everyone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2006, 01:05 AM
Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
jonnyc747
Default

hi guys, just noticed this thread now and need to know some more...

i am having problems with jittery DVDs so I have set my project settings to

Field Order: None (progressive)

Now I need to know what to set my Deinterlace method to? I have no idea about this.... my video contains fast moving cars and im wondering has the deinterlacing effect got any bearing on how the video will look?

Thanks in advance guys

Also should my Pixel Aspect Ratio = 1.0926 (PAL DV) if working with Standard DV avi files?
Up to now I have just used the default settings.

Jonny
__________________
----------------------------------
JonnyC
----------------------------------
AMD Athlon XP3000+
1Gb RAM
2x200GB Maxtor SATA Internal
1x300GB Seagate SATA Internal
256MB nVidia GeForce FX6600 AGP
XP Pro
----------------------------------
Sony DCR-TR7000E
----------------------------------
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2006, 11:29 AM
vegasarian's Avatar
Senior Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Esher, Surrey.
Posts: 322
vegasarian is on a distinguished road
Default

Well I would choose Blend Fields and do a short test render of a fast moving sequence to see how it looks.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2006, 12:03 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 8,440
Marc Peters has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vegasarian
As Mark suggested I would always render in progressive for DVD especially if you're taking snapshots from the video (with bliurred action). If you render these with lower or upper field first you will get horrendous jitter on the DVD. You wont notice this on your comp but you certainly will on a TV.
Never make progressive from interlaced video for DVDs. Why? Because by definition you will be discarding half the resolution! Software DVD players have a de-intelace filter and TVs have the capacity to play the interlaced MPEG. Bottom line? Don't de-interlace DVDs!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2006, 01:28 PM
Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
jonnyc747
Default

thanks guys for the replies but i am even more confused now...

my output has to be on DVD so what settings do you recommend for field order and deinterlace mode?

Thanks
__________________
----------------------------------
JonnyC
----------------------------------
AMD Athlon XP3000+
1Gb RAM
2x200GB Maxtor SATA Internal
1x300GB Seagate SATA Internal
256MB nVidia GeForce FX6600 AGP
XP Pro
----------------------------------
Sony DCR-TR7000E
----------------------------------
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad render quality. Automatic Sony Vegas and Media Studio 12 01-07-2007 01:11 PM
Gettin the best quality possible, like dvd quality videoboy Adobe Premiere, Premiere Elements, and After Effects 2 11-28-2005 03:38 PM
Vegas Render Quality JLove450 Sony Vegas and Media Studio 2 11-23-2005 03:29 PM
Light and quality capturing quality MrChad General Software Problems 1 05-15-2005 09:53 PM
Unable to Render. transitions/effects will not render. HELP ryan_san General Software Problems 10 08-17-2004 02:53 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:37 PM.