Go Back   Video Editing Forums: Digital Director > Video Editing: Software Problems and buying advice > Sony Vegas and Media Studio

Sony Vegas and Media Studio Yep, I know they're not related, but they both fall in the Premiere Alternative bracket in my humble opinion! Post here for Ulead Media Studio or Vegas video problems or pointers...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2005, 05:14 AM
Junior Member
Windows Movie Maker
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4
vegasshiz
Default best sony vegas render?

wut is the best setup for rendering a video i need the best quality possible
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2005, 10:16 PM
irishmark's Avatar
Your Moderatorness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,383
irishmark is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Skype™ to irishmark
Default

uncompressed avi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 11:02 AM
Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 54
GrandMasterKaja
Default

I got a question about that, whenever I try to turn a video into an uncompressed AVI, instead of staying at it's current size and quality, the file gets gigantic and looks no better. How do I solve this problem?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 12:17 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 8,497
Marc Peters has disabled reputation
Default

It will never look better than the source. Just the same.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 04:29 PM
Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 54
GrandMasterKaja
Default

What I mean was, if the picture isn't better then why would I want to keep a file so huge and how do I keep it from doing that?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 05:19 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 8,497
Marc Peters has disabled reputation
Default

(Very) General rule of thumb: the less compressed, the easier to edit and the better the quality of subsequent encodes. If it's the final product, then you can compress as much as you want and get your desired level of image quality.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 06:05 PM
Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 54
GrandMasterKaja
Default

What are you saying that I should turn all my compressed files into uncomrpessed avi files, edit them, then compress them again?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-23-2005, 03:04 PM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 4,856
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

If you are going to render within a project then I advise using uncompressed. This avoids the large generation loss associated with repeat trips through the DV codec. Remmber DV is very compressed, 7 to 1 I think, with very poor colour resoloution.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2006, 07:10 AM
Junior Member
Standard Definition
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Montréal
Posts: 5
SurroundSoundFreak is on a distinguished road
Default

Currenly I render in Vegas 6 at NTSC DV Widescreen, progressive, 720x480, pixel ratio 1.2121 (my sources are photoshop images in 720x480 pixel ratio 1.2121).
And get a 11gb file for 46 minutes. Then I use DVD Architect to burn the thing. It gives a pretty good result.

But I'm wondering if I would get a better result by rendering at avi uncompressed and let Architect take care of the encoding? (so the question would be is Architect encode better than Vegas... or wich order is better).
__________________
SurroundSoundFreak
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2006, 07:45 PM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 4,856
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I would think any change would be negligable, it's only with repeated encodes that changes become noticable.

In the real world not many of us can afford the space needed to work on umcompressed files that avoid any gen loss except on small projects.

I suppose i might work on uncompressed video for a project that i had filmed on very good quality cameras and was going to make me mega bucks and maybe be for cinema screening but apart from that i would stick with the dv codec for most editing work.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sony vegas slow Render problem manje Sony Vegas and Media Studio 5 05-08-2008 08:05 AM
Vegas Render Speeds marrs Sony Vegas and Media Studio 6 12-21-2006 08:08 PM
Can I render H.264 from Vegas 6.0? [N2] Sony Vegas and Media Studio 7 08-08-2006 11:50 AM
Can't seem to render in Vegas 6 steveandbelinda Sony Vegas and Media Studio 3 12-08-2005 11:28 PM
Help me with Vegas/ render as WMV/ issues toddk Sony Vegas and Media Studio 4 11-04-2004 08:12 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:45 AM.