Go Back   Video Editing Forums: Digital Director > Video Editing: Software Problems and buying advice > Sony Vegas and Media Studio

Sony Vegas and Media Studio Yep, I know they're not related, but they both fall in the Premiere Alternative bracket in my humble opinion! Post here for Ulead Media Studio or Vegas video problems or pointers...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2007, 05:34 AM
Junior Member
Windows Movie Maker
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4
416film is on a distinguished road
Default Sony DV CoDec YUV to RGB is bad

Anyone else notice this problem?

The exact same DV source image was loaded into Vegas and rendered out twice as Huff (actually I tried a whole bunch of lossless CoDecs and they all came out the same). The only difference between them is one used Sony's DV CoDec (by selecting "Ignore 3rd party codecs" in Options) and the other wasn't (by unselecting this option.)
The Sony CoDec produced the more "mangled" looking image (it is zoomed 200%). Some dithering artifacts were introduced when I converted the images to GIFs, but it almost looks like the chroma of the Sony render is at half rez.
Sony's CoDec works fine so long as the render format is DV, but using it and rendering to ANY OTHER CoDec is giving me these horrible chroma artifacts.
I have even tried different versions of Vegas and have gotten the same results. Considering that Sony's CoDec is the default setting, I find it hard to believe that I'm the first to notice this. Is it just me?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2007, 06:35 AM
Senior Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 910
Grazie is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Grazie
Default

Interesting. No, I am not aware of this happening.

Is the CLEAR consistent image BEFORE rendering and the jagged edges sample AFTER?

What format IS the still?

Did you use/try the uncompressed FORMAT?

In any event you say you used OTHER templates too and NOT get this. I'm wondering if these other templates/codecs are going an extra mile to get this?

How is your PROJECT set up to deal with 2 field or whatever? I know, it should NOT make a gnat's breathe of a difference.

I've had peripheral Fx artifacts occur in the past .. I need to see if this is still the case.

I really want to replicate your experience on my setup. I really do.

Interesting, and thanks for sharing. You now have my full attention

Grazie
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2007, 10:15 AM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,009
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Tell the truth I have never given anything like this a thought. All my codec concerns to date have been focused on getting the best from high compression wmv - but this has my attention too.

Off to work in a sec but i am going to follow this up later - I just hate those dv chroma effects and anything that might reduce them would be ace.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2007, 06:41 PM
Junior Member
Windows Movie Maker
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4
416film is on a distinguished road
Default

The above images are both renders; the Sony CoDec and the system default Codec (which I assume is Microsoft). The source material was identical in both renders. The non-Sony render looks just like the source DV footage.
I created the colour chart artificially because it showed off the problem very clearly, but I have been doing a (pardon my French) shit load of tests with real camera footage with the same results (even with the uncompressed option). It's harder to see with "normal" footage. I started to see the problem with greenscreen footage. The transition from green screen to subject matter became very blocky.
But just so you know: I made the colour chart in Combustion. It of course is beautiful 24bit RGB, with sharp edges. I rendered the chart to DV, where it did pick up some DV artifacts, but no more than expected. I used this DV source for the above test, but as I say, any DV footage can be used, this one just shows off the problem very clearly. The way in which this source footage was generated is not part of the problem.
I tried all sorts of iterations, but every time I rendered to any CoDec other than DV, the Sony CoDec would butcher the chroma. I even tried forcing Vegas to interpret the source material as progressive and rendered both interlaced and progressive. I also forced the image to go through a complete recompression by adding a slight colour correct or putting some text on it. The Sony CoDec always looked fine when rendering to DV, but otherwise it was crap.

I would really like to use the Sony CoDec because it appears to be the only DV CoDec that doesn't clip off highlight detail (anything above 235cv/100 IRE) when it does its YUV to RGB conversion.
FYI: I'm always exporting footage from my Vegas edit to do VFX work in Combustion. I render out select shots as DV, and Vegas just make a perfect copy of the footage without recompressing (as it should). Even the highlight detail is still there. Problem is, when the footage come into Combustion, the highlight detail is clipped off in a standard YUV to RGB conversion.
I discovered that if I use the Sony DV CoDec and export to Huff (or Alpary or Uncompressed, etc.) the highlight detail remains, and since it's now RGB no conversion is done when it's pulled into Combustion and all the highlight details are there.
That's great! I love it! But then I noticed what it does to the chroma. Retch!
I would much rather lose a bit of highlight detail than butcher the chroma so much.



Anyway... In a nut shell...
Sony DV CoDec works fine so long as the final render is back to DV. ANY other kind of render format has crappy chroma atifacts.
The solution is to only render to DV or use a third pary DV CoDec when rendering to a non-DV format.
Only problem is, every other DV CoDec I've tried chops off the hightlight detail.

Why can't I have the best of both worlds?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2007, 08:57 PM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,009
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

" Anyway... In a nut shell...
Sony DV CoDec works fine so long as the final render is back to DV. ANY other kind of render format has crappy chroma atifacts.
The solution is to only render to DV or use a third pary DV CoDec when rendering to a non-DV format.
Only problem is, every other DV CoDec I've tried chops off the hightlight detail. "

Thanks for that tip.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2007, 03:11 PM
Junior Member
Windows Movie Maker
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4
416film is on a distinguished road
Default

Can anyone duplicate this test?
I still find it hard to believe that Sony's CoDec has been doing this for years and no one else has noticed it.
If it can't be duplicated, then I have to dig deeper into my system to figure out what's wrong.

Thanks in advance...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2007, 03:17 PM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,009
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Yes, I will give it a go over the next few days some time and post my results.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
H.264 Codec? DHbiker Sony Vegas and Media Studio 4 10-01-2006 05:39 AM
What codec should I use? kaisellgren General Software Problems 10 03-23-2006 02:28 PM
Codec to use for HD? GrandMasterKaja Sony Vegas and Media Studio 1 11-23-2005 03:09 PM
Best Codec to use??? pschmidt Adobe Premiere, Premiere Elements, and After Effects 2 06-10-2004 01:22 PM
which codec is the best? fashionmint General Software Problems 5 12-26-2003 12:57 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 AM.