| | | | | The Perfect Video Editing PC Post the specifications of your video editing rig or for advice on how to set up a performance video editing PC | 
12-05-2007, 02:19 AM
| | Junior Member Standard Definition | | Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5
| | Harddrive solution to succesfully Capture HDV footage? Have a question about hard drive setup to capture HD video. Spec'ing out a new machine per the following to edit my new Sony HC-7 HDV camcorder, photoshop, and maybe play a game or two:
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-38-DQ6 (new X38 CHipset)
Ram: G. Skill 8GB (4x2GB) DDR2 1000 (PC2800)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Video Card: Geforce 8800GT with 512GB ram
Harddrives: 2 WD Raptors 36GB as Raid 0 for OS/System Drive (old),
Western Digital 160GB drive for general data storage/scratch drive (old)
New 2x400GB WD Harddrives setup as Raid 0 to capture video???????
For the Operating System, I plan to setup the Raptors in Raid 0 then partition them into separate drives to create a dual boot config with vista 64 and windows XP 32bit. XP is there really just for video editing due to all the driver issues with Vista 64bit OS.
What I'm worried about is some recommendations I've come across for 4 HDDs setup as Raid 0 to capture HDV files. I was only planning on getting two nice drives like the WD 400GB HDD setup as Raid 0. What solutions to capture HD footage have some of you found that works? Do you think the above hardware can get me by with two HDD in Raid 0 or is even that necessary for HD capture?
Thanks in advance, | 
12-05-2007, 09:53 AM
|  | Opinionated Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 4,730
| | You DO NOT need raid 0 to capture hdv. Any old crappy drive will do, honest. DV SD actually captures at a higher bit rate than hdv 24mbit/s v 20mbit/s.
Also dont forget raid 0 is less safe than one drive, lose one drivein a raid 0 array and you have lost the lot.
My advice is to use raid 1 on the 2 400 gig drives for peace of mind and you still get a performance increase.
__________________
I have one prejudice - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders. www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
| 
12-05-2007, 09:54 AM
|  | Opinionated Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 4,730
| | Also 8 gig ram is overkill but cool if money is not an issue.
__________________
I have one prejudice - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders. www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
| 
12-05-2007, 04:26 PM
| | Junior Member Standard Definition | | Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5
| | Thanks for the info guys. This link is where I got some info on using a Raid 0 with 4 drives. Maybe I got confused by his post (see last post on this thread): Videoguys Forums :: View topic - Drive question again
In any event, that is good to hear that my proposed setup will work. Oh, I am adding 8GB of ram now just to future proof this thing for the next 3 years. It will only be about $130 to go from 4 to 8.
Thanks again, | 
12-05-2007, 10:50 PM
| | Junior Member Standard Definition | | Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5
| | I have another question related to Raid. I understand for very large files (Video streaming etc.) a larger stripesize is better. For mainstream usage (office, gaming etc.) a stripe and clustersize in the 8-32 kB range is a common choice, of course the optimum stripe and clustersize combination also depends on the RAID controller and drives. Since this forum is related to video editing, what stripe and cluster size have you guys setup? | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 09:44 PM. | | | | |