hahaha I just clicked on the link you put and it took me to cream photos page lol. yeah, its carolyn who posted that. like I said, she has a lot of dirt on this guy. He knows it is there, but wont do shit, coz he knows she has the evidence to back it up.
All the best Tim
What webpage are you referring to? if its about my post about Squashed Apple, I doubt there is anything he can do about it. It is all true with evidence to back it all up. Myself and Carolyn Wimpenny from Cream photo have now had enough of this idiot, and after contacting watchdog, trading standards and everyone else about it, no one is willing to make a move against the guy. Its as if he is untouchable. He needs bringing down, or at the very least, videographers and photographers need to know that there is a significant risk of there interlectural property being plagurised by this company. What is it you think I should remove? or do you think I should just reword some of it?
Cheers for your input Tim anyway.
All the best.
Hi. Forgive me for suggesting this, but you may want to re-consider your webpage at SQUASHED APPLE PHOTOGRAPHY before seeking any legal advice. Or at least to tell the Solicitor about the page, in case they recommend removing it.