| | | | | Camcorder Reviews, Problems and Shooting Share your thoughts on making the perfect home movie | 
01-17-2008, 12:54 PM
| | Junior Member HDTV | | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
0 Videos nominated Video Of the Month(s): 0 | | Canon HV 20 review
Hello,
I have been trying out some consumer cameras and the HV 20 was my favorite (at least in 2007). I posted the review on my blog at Digital Video and Film
The only real downside with the HV 20 (for me) is that I am leaning toward AVCHD and the HV 20 is HDV.
Let me know if this helps.
Take care,
Z
| 
01-17-2008, 06:08 PM
|  | Opinionated Moderator | | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,437
2 Videos nominated Video Of the Month(s): 0 | |
HVD poops all over AVCHD.
The latter uses much more compression and the video produced is often in a weird format that can be fiddly to edit.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions. www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
| 
01-17-2008, 06:48 PM
| | Junior Member HDTV | | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
0 Videos nominated Video Of the Month(s): 0 | | HDV vs AVCHD
Mark is correct that the compression ratio of AVCHD is higher than HDV.
He is also correct that there is more (and better) support in video editing software for HDV than for AVCHD today.
I am interested in AVCHD due to the fact that I think this is where the industry is going and that vendors will slowly clean the poop off AVCHD such that it will in fact be superior to HDV, perhaps even in the next generation of AVCHD camcorders.
Zam
my blog: Digital Video and Film | 
01-17-2008, 10:05 PM
|  | Senior Member Video Editing Junkie | | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Western Europe
Posts: 2,399
0 Videos nominated Video Of the Month(s): 0 | |
If I went out tomorrow and purchased a camcorder that used AVCHD, would it work with any of the current video editors straight out of the box, or would I have to struggle with converting it to one of the more friendly file formats? What it might do in six months or in a years time is anyone's guess.
__________________
Better than a poke in the eye with a pointy stick any day...
| 
01-17-2008, 10:44 PM
|  | Opinionated Moderator | | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,437
2 Videos nominated Video Of the Month(s): 0 | |
I dont think hard drive cameras are the future - the future is solid state.
Hard drives get full - then you are stuffed.
Hard drives are easy to bust - every portable device I have ever owned with a hard drive in has had the drive bust.
I see all these HD cameras as a cynical exercise in marketing, just something new to get peoples dollar - I have heard sales people say that DV tape is 'old' and that HD is 'better'.
Sure, you dont have to capture in real time - big deal - you have to watch all your fottage lots of times anyway so I watch the capture, thus wasting no time.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions. www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
| | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | Review Process? | Chapman Photography | Sony Vegas and Media Studio | 2 | 04-23-2006 10:00 PM | | Review Wanted! | Glen | Camcorder Reviews, Problems and Shooting | 1 | 05-25-2005 03:46 PM | | Slightly different review! | Nigel | Pimp the Link | 0 | 05-10-2005 10:44 PM | | XL2 Review | LJR | Forum Announcements, News and Off-topic | 1 | 11-09-2004 07:21 PM |  All times are GMT. The time now is 01:22 AM. | | | | |