Go Back   Video Editing Forums: Digital Director > Hardware: PCs and Camcorders > Camcorder Reviews, Problems and Shooting

Camcorder Reviews, Problems and Shooting Share your thoughts on making the perfect home movie

View Poll Results: So which one should I buy for best video ?
Canon Ixus 0 0%
Panasonic Lumix 0 0%
Sanyo Xacti 0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2007, 10:31 PM
Junior Member
Windows Movie Maker
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
0 Videos nominated
Video Of the Month(s): 0
ChristopherB is on a distinguished road
Default I know how to measure a 'still', but what about a 'video'?

Over the past 5 years I have had many stills digital compact cameras - Canon Ixus, Sony Cybershots, Kyocera Finecam to name a few. In parallel to this I have had 1 single video camera JVC GR-DVP9.

Each time I buy a new stills camera I consider if 'THE HYBRID' has arrived yet and I think this year it may have - what do you think?

I want fairly good stills quality ... 5MP+ is good enough and fairly good video quality but the thing is I can't work out how to grade video. 'Stills' is easy, count up to a certain amount of Megapixels, check out the optics and if a good make then chances are it will be OK.

So, I have narrowed down my stills compact choice to 3 'Editors Choices' of - The Ixus 860 IS (640x480 @30fps) , The Pansonic Lumix TZ3 (640x480 @30fps - VGA or QVGA but no sound) or the Sanyo Xacti VPC-CA65 or VPC-HD2 (again 640x480 @30fps).

If going just for stills then the Sanyo would not feature on the list but it gets rave reviews as a hybrid.

So, back to the question - how do I tell the quality of the video as they are all listed as 640x480 @30fps. Ok, the optics and processor make a difference but how do I tell.

and how will the video compare to my old JVC GR-DVP9?

Should I get the hybrid ?

Thanks in advance
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2007, 01:06 AM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,375
0 Videos nominated
Video Of the Month(s): 0
Chapman Photography is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I would never use a still camara for video, none do video justice.
__________________
Wil Chapman Jr.
Oly, Washington
DP, Producer, Editor

Feel free to visit ( UPDATED!!! )
http://www.myspace.com/chapmanphotography
http://www.myspace.com/sport_specific (personal and training site)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2007, 11:41 AM
Mihai's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,612
0 Videos nominated
Video Of the Month(s): 0
Mihai is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to Mihai Send a message via Skype™ to Mihai
Default

None. Really.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2007, 11:44 AM
shiner's Avatar
Senior Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Prague
Posts: 474
0 Videos nominated
Video Of the Month(s): 0
shiner is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I'd have a look at this CASIO

Movie samples from it are here CASIO - IN TOUCH WITH THE FUTURE
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2007, 07:19 PM
Junior Member
Windows Movie Maker
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
0 Videos nominated
Video Of the Month(s): 0
ChristopherB is on a distinguished road
Default Please help me choose WHICH one.

Yeah thanks for the comments but they are not really what I was looking for . . . .of course there is no comparrison between a dedicated Video cam and using the video aspect of a stills camera but my need is to have a single product that captures the moment, I will be neither printing the stills out or doing much with the video.

I used to have loads of time and was keen to edit footage and be creative with stills but now I pretty much want to take snaps of the happy bride and groom and switch to video for the throwing of the bouquet or take photos of my son in his smart new school uniform and then shoot some movement as he waves goodbye on his first day. Stuff that is 'good enough' in low quality resolution as keepsakes.

At the moment, as I have 2 products (StillCam and Video) but I end up taking my crummy stills camera and switching to the equally crummy video.

The above camera's get rave reviews but which is best for video?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2007, 07:35 PM
Junior Member
Windows Movie Maker
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
0 Videos nominated
Video Of the Month(s): 0
mike787 is on a distinguished road
Default

ChristopherB, I have the same problem, just posted a new link 'Panasonic or Sony'. I am wondering if either of these would meet your requirements, (which I think we both share). Either unit may be somewhat future proof ... for a while at least! Just wondering if anyone will be able to answer my posting.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:17 PM.