Go Back   Video Editing Forums: Digital Director > Hardware: PCs and Camcorders > Camcorder Reviews, Problems and Shooting

Camcorder Reviews, Problems and Shooting Share your thoughts on making the perfect home movie

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2007, 01:11 PM
Junior Member
Standard Definition
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Martin Chambers is on a distinguished road
Default Camera choice for progressive recording

Hi there,
I am producing short clips for internet use and I currently have a Sony FX1 camera.
However, interlacing is a problem since all computer displays are progressive scan.
Would I be better of with a camera that shoots in true progessive mode and if so, which is the best one?
Martin
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2007, 01:15 PM
Alan Mills's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,613
Alan Mills is on a distinguished road
Default

Why not just deinterlace your captured footage and then simply edit it as 25p?

or do what I do. Do all the editting from my own FX1 as 50i and then worry about deinterlacing on or not on my final export. That way, I still have the option of intelaced product if I care to make a DVD version of the project later on.
__________________
I'm not young enough to know everything!

Last edited by Alan Mills; 05-16-2007 at 01:18 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2007, 01:25 PM
Junior Member
Standard Definition
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Martin Chambers is on a distinguished road
Default

Interesting reply (and quick)!
I always thought it was best to deinterlace after the edit (I use VirtualDub with the Panasonic codec) . Am I wrong, should I deinterlace first?
How do you deinterlace?
And do you not see evidence of your interlacing nonetheless on a computer screen? I do, hence my original question.
Thanks Alan.
Martin
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2007, 04:37 PM
Best_OutRunner's Avatar
Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland!
Posts: 82
Best_OutRunner is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Best_OutRunner Send a message via MSN to Best_OutRunner
Default

Emm depends what the guy wants for his progressive scan, if you want Progressive scan as in solid 50 or 60fps Progressive then IMO your best bet would be getting a camera that can record to 720p, however there are some pretty amazing deinterlacers out there that can make deinteralced 50i and 60i look like 50p/60p these days.
__________________
It's not about what camera you use or how much it cost.

It's about what you shoot,
how you shot it,
and how you edit it :P
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2007, 08:16 AM
Junior Member
Standard Definition
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Martin Chambers is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for that. What deinterlacers / techniques do you recommend?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2007, 10:09 AM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,118
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I agree - you dont really need a progressive camera, especially for net distribution what with all that compression.

Progressive cameras are valued by many for that 'filmy' look, but this is only of great value if the end result is going to be shown as high quality progressive.

If I need to deinteralace I usually do it in vegas but v dub does a good job too. There are some add on deinterlacers that give great results - cant remember the name. Will post if i recall.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2007, 10:53 AM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,118
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Remembered it - Smart Deinterlacer Filter for VirtualDub
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 09:43 AM
Junior Member
Standard Definition
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Martin Chambers is on a distinguished road
Default

I use that one already. It's good but not as good a job as I would like.
I think I'll have to wait for an affordable progressive camera.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 10:41 AM
Mark W's Avatar
Opinionated Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol uk
Posts: 5,118
Mark W is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

IN the mean time i find avoiding fast shutter speeds can reduce interlace atrifacts. A bit.
__________________
I have two prejudices - I am anti HDV for consumer camcorders, and I eat mooks who claim to be pro wedding vidders and ask dumb questions.

www.zaskarfilms.com You tube channel 'zaskarfilms'
JVC DV5001e (big cam), Sony PC6E (tiny cam), Vinten pro5, PAG light, SM58, Sony ECM50, Sony C-76, 0.5x convertors for sony, Rode video mic, Vegas 7.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 10:52 AM
Junior Member
Standard Definition
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Martin Chambers is on a distinguished road
Default

What about a faster frame rate?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital Camera recording mode den1 Camcorder Reviews, Problems and Shooting 3 03-22-2006 09:05 PM
Recording on the go (off camera) Rob Sound Recording and Audio Editing 2 03-04-2006 02:12 PM
recording from camera problems :( Seejay General Software Problems 1 03-03-2006 10:41 PM
"Jumpy" when recording back to camera MaryD Sony Vegas and Media Studio 3 11-04-2004 04:45 PM
Camera Choice + Some other ?'s p4ocer Camcorder Reviews, Problems and Shooting 9 06-01-2004 11:08 PM

Branded 2 728x90


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12 AM.