Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Macbook Pro requirements for Final Cut or Premiere PLUS Adobe After Effects? Help!

  1. #1
    maxcady is offline Junior Member Windows Movie Maker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default Macbook Pro requirements for Final Cut or Premiere PLUS Adobe After Effects? Help!

    Hi everyone,

    I'm about to buy a Macbook Pro so I can do some editing and learn After Effects as well as Cinema 4d (I think thats what it's called)

    Problem is, I'm not sure what Macbook Pro specs are enough for these programs to perform well.


    I was looking at the Apple Store Macs and saw these among others-



    1.) MacBook Pro 2.0GHz quad-core Intel i7


    Originally released February 2011
    15.4-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit glossy widescreen display, 1440-by-900 resolution
    4GB (2 x 2GB) of 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM
    500GB Serial ATA @ 5400 rpm
    8x double-layer SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    Intel HD Graphics 3000 and AMD Radeon HD 6490M

    2.) MacBook Pro 2.8GHz Intel Core i7

    Originally released April 2010
    15.4-inch LED-backlit glossy widescreen display (1440 x 900 pixel)
    4GB (2 x 2GB) of 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM
    500GB Serial ATA @ 5400 rpm
    8x double-layer SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR3 memory



    3.) MacBook Pro 2.2GHz quad-core Intel i7

    Originally released February 2011
    15.4-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit glossy widescreen display, 1440-by-900 resolution
    4GB (2 x 2GB) of 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM
    500GB Serial ATA @ 7200 rpm
    8x double-layer SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    Intel HD Graphics 3000 and AMD Radeon HD 6750M




    Without factoring the price, can you guys tell me which one you would get and why?


    Is option #1 for the programs that I want to run and for editing a full length digital feature film?


    Thanks for your help!

  2. #2
    paulears is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Lowestoft
    Posts
    691

    Default

    This might not help, but I bought the 13" version with the 2.8GHz Intel core i7 processor with the 750G drive - and on this one no clever video graphics - but compared with my Dell that just died, I'm amazingly pleased (apart from the software you have to start from scratch with) - however, I'm running production premium and straight out of the box it runs 3 HD streams in multi cam with no stuttering and I am really pleased with it.It's such a surprise to be able to render out a file and be able to start word up, print a document, close it down, and then do some internet stuff without the rendering stalling - which always seems to happen when multitasking on windows.

    I'd be happy with either of the current models.

  3. #3
    maxcady is offline Junior Member Windows Movie Maker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default

    These Mac are awesome and I'll be upgrading from a regular Macbook to a Pro.

    There is a $400 range between the 3 of those, so I just wanted to know if even the lower one is sufficient for all of my needs.

    Thanks for your response!

  4. #4
    Marc Peters's Avatar
    Marc Peters is offline Just Some Bloke
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    11,009
    Blog Entries
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulears View Post
    compared with my Dell that just died, I'm amazingly pleased.
    Is this a like for like comparison? I have a two year old i7 dell laptop rinning CS5. This boots rapidly, never produces any unexpected errors, and multitasks admirably. I could quite happily render whilst surfing, but try to use the machine for editing alone.

  5. #5
    paulears is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Lowestoft
    Posts
    691

    Default

    No - not a like for like in terms of performance - but you can run happily on batteries for ages, and open the lid and it's up and running instantly. I'm not a windows knocker - but I now see why MAC users have always had those smug grins. The display on this 13" is crisp enough to mean I can edit without using an external monitor. Build quality is a totally different point. My dell - 3 years old is on it's second power supply - and of course, you can only use Dell PSUs or the won't charge the battery. The lid hinges are worn out, and the keyboard tired. The Mac is a lump of aluminium - so light and very rigid. The touch pad is much better than the Dell. When it was new, the Dell was pretty swish, but I'm impressed. Using parallels, and a brand new copy of windows 7 - it can happily run the few windows only programmes I have, and windows starts and shuts down in much the same time as my rack mount edit PC - which is also an i7. I've been working on a theatre show, with Act 1 on the PC system and Act 2 on the Mac, and render time seems about the same - give or take a few minutes, however - Encore failed on the PC - maybe just one of those germlins when compressing an unrendered simple edit - I don't know. It did it 2nd time fine.

    This mac is also small enough that I ran it wired to the camera and used premiere to import live - which saved me some transfer time. I tried this on the Dell last year, but half way through Windows started doing something and the import stopped - so I never tried again. It could just be luck so far, I fully realise. The experience, however, so far is pretty positive and I've not found anything I dislike, although Finder isn't quite so nice as Windows Explorer - although I'm sure I'll adjust. More USBs would be nice, and they're a little close together for some of my dongles. Spending £1400 on a laptop is not something I did lightly - but the Apple store people are not remotely pushy, and splitting the information from the purchase does remove the 'sale at any cost' attitude computer shops usually have.

    My results so far probably mean no more high end desktop PC purchases - I've always built my own before, on the assumption that apart from what they look like outside, only a few bits inside are critical. Maybe I'll change that view too?

    One plus point is that for theatre use we frequently use Q-lab to run video and audio live, and I discovered that q-lab for audio use is free! You just pay for video, and rather neatly, you can buy a license, or pay for a weekly license only when you need it.

  6. #6
    maxcady is offline Junior Member Windows Movie Maker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Thanks for that detailed post. It's good to see that it's working out well for you and your projects. Yeah, after being a Mac user for 5 years, pc's won't be in my wishlist anytime soon. Good tip on Q-lab!

Similar Threads

  1. will the macbook pro i am getting be able to run final cut pro x?
    By thesleepylemur in forum The White Rooms: Video Editing the Mac Way
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-15-2011, 12:29 PM
  2. Anybody use Final Cut on a MacBook?
    By themightyshrub in forum General Software Problems
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-05-2008, 11:52 AM
  3. Adobe Premiere 6.5 - Cant produce final AVI movie
    By Penfold in forum Adobe Premiere, Premiere Elements, and After Effects
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-16-2007, 07:19 PM
  4. Adobe premiere 1.5 or Final Cut pro 5????Need Help!!!!
    By chris86 in forum Adobe Premiere, Premiere Elements, and After Effects
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-07-2005, 10:45 PM
  5. Adobe Premiere on PC vs. Final Cut on Mac
    By jh in forum Adobe Premiere, Premiere Elements, and After Effects
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-21-2004, 12:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •