View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2007, 04:48 PM
Best_OutRunner's Avatar
Best_OutRunner Best_OutRunner is offline
Member
Video Editing Junkie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland!
Posts: 82
0 Videos nominated
Video Of the Month(s): 0
Best_OutRunner is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Best_OutRunner Send a message via MSN to Best_OutRunner
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Mills View Post
I was only referring to vertical res here. Of course they are all 1440 rather than 1920. At least one of the cameras linked recorded at only 720 lines (or something similar). Technically high def, like all those "HD Ready" TVs is see in the shops, but basically not worth touching - even with someone else's proverbial barge pole.

I wouldn't go as far as to say 720p isn't worth touching, I'd just say it's not worth the price they charge for it.

You have to be careful about how you deinterlace 1080i though, pixel adaptive deinterlacing looks perfect, weaving is ok if you dont mind the half framerate look, however, a lot of the crappy TV sets show each field on its own, making it 540p, less resolution than PAL damn!
__________________
It's not about what camera you use or how much it cost.

It's about what you shoot,
how you shot it,
and how you edit it :P
Reply With Quote